🔗 Share this article

For Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the World Series did not happen during the tense final game on Saturday, when her team pulled off one death-defying comeback act after another before winning in overtime over the opposing team.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, decisive sequence that at the same time upended many harmful misconceptions promoted about Latinos in recent years.

The play in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder raced in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to second base to record another, decisive out. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball moments before a runner barreled into him, sending him backwards.

This was not just a remarkable athletic achievement, possibly the decisive turn in the series in the Dodgers' favor after appearing for most of the games like the underdog team. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, troops patrolling the streets, and a steady stream of criticism from official sources.

"The players presented this counter-narrative," explained the professor. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a distinct kind of confidence. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos detained and chased down. It is so simple to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who show up faithfully to home games and fill up as many as 50% of the venue's 50,000 seats per game.

A Mixed Relationship with the Organization

After intensified immigration raids started in Los Angeles in early June, and national guard units were deployed into the city to react to resulting demonstrations, two of the local soccer clubs quickly released messages of support with immigrant families – but not the Dodgers.

The team president has said the organization prefer to steer clear of political issues – a view colored, perhaps, by the fact that a sizable portion of the supporters, even Latinos, are supporters of certain political figures. After significant public pressure, the organization subsequently committed $one million in support for individuals personally affected by the operations but issued no official condemnation of the administration.

White House Event and Historical Legacy

Three months before, the organization did not delay in accepting an invitation to mark their 2024 World Series win at the official residence – a decision that local columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' pride in having been the first major league franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the values it represents by officials and current and former athletes. A number of players including the manager had voiced unwillingness to go to the White House during the initial period but then reconsidered or succumbed to pressure from the organization.

Corporate Control and Fan Conflicts

An additional issue for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a corporate behemoth, the ownership group, whose investments, according to sources and its own published financial documents, include a stake in a private prison company that operates detention facilities. The group's executives has said many times that it wants to remain neutral of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the financial stake – are their own type of compliance to current agendas.

These factors contribute to considerable mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – feelings that emerged even in the euphoria of this year's hard-won championship triumph and the following outpouring of team support across the city.

"Can one to root for the team?" local columnist one observer reflected at the beginning of the postseason in an elegant article pondering on "Dodger blue in our veins, but uncertainty in our minds". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt strongly, to the extent that he decided his personal boycott must have brought the team the luck it required to succeed.

Separating the Team from the Management

Many fans who have similar misgivings appear to have concluded that they can continue to support the team and its lineup of international players, including the Japanese megastar a key player, while pouring scorn on the organization's corporate leadership. At no place was this more evident than at the victory celebration at the home venue on Monday, when the packed audience cheered in support of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the chief executive of the investors.

"These men in suits don't get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, however, runs deeper than only the organization's current proprietors. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s involved the city razing three working-class Hispanic neighborhoods on a elevated area overlooking the city center and then transferring the land to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A song on a mid-2000s album that documents the story has an low-income worker at the venue revealing that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most influential Mexican American columnist and media personality, sees a darker side to the long, problematic relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even harmful devotion by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.

"They've acted around Latino followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the peak of the demonstrations when the city center was under to a evening curfew.

Global Players and Community Connections

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy task, {