🔗 Share this article

It all began with a isolated photograph, possibly the most significant ever taken of a royal family member.

There stood the Duke of York, standing closely beside a young woman, while an associate beamed knowingly in the backdrop.

Absent that photograph, captured at a social event in 2001, who would have believed the claims of a adolescent who said she was transported across the sea and obliged to have perfunctory intimate contact with a individual of the monarchy?

A curious, indicative gesture by someone who had publicly asserted to have not known about her, asserted he could not have had intimate contact with her, and yet handed over a substantial sum of monarchical funds to settle a long-delayed court action.

Over a Decade of Disgrace

Against this backdrop, discussions of the royal family acting decisively to cut Andrew off are inaccurate. This affair has continued for the largest portion of 15 years since that photograph, and a further image of Andrew walking amiably with a notorious individual came to light.

• Arrogance: To what extent did his siblings, perhaps even his parents, understand that Andrew was so presumptuous?
• Questionable Associations: They must have known, if his staff and the police were fulfilling their roles, that he had some deeply disreputable friends given he unabashedly welcomed them to estates.
• Fiscal Irresponsibility: If the monarchy did not know about his intimate behaviors, they certainly knew about his overspending with taxpayer funds.

Journeys were listed in public records: private aircraft transfers from the estate to a country club and back again in time for midday meal, chartered planes instead of commercial flights, all for the convenience of "the frequent flyer".

Existence of Entitlement

Additionally the presumption which required subservience when he entered a space or the supreme awareness about his honorifics used on his correspondence in messages to his personal acquaintances.

He avoided accountability while his matriarch, who inexplicably spoiled him, was still surviving. The Queen did at least remove him of official roles and honorary colonelcies in the consequence of his ill-fated and, it is now clear, untruthful television interview six years ago.

Latest Events

Merely in the last two weeks that events accelerated, following the publication of accounts giving more grim information of his behavior and that of his associates.

Further disclosures have again highlighted Andrew's thinking that he could avoid lying about his interaction with a notorious figure.

The public (and the media) were far in advance of the royals. There was no one of any consequence to defend him, a result of all those years of arrogance.

Monarchical Concerns

The wiser monarchical figures recognized that. The primary concern is to pass on the monarchy, if not as heretofore at least complete and untarnished.

Over time the last 190 years trying to overcome the legacy of earlier rulers, demonstrating they are beneficial, responsible and attentive to their people.

Andrew was putting all that in danger in an time when submission and discretion is no longer enough.

The Fallout

Ultimately, the well-known indecisive king was pressured further. There was no other option. The institution had surrendered command of the account.

Currently the removal of titles and the ongoing and permanent social disgrace that will hurt Andrew most severely.

• Downgrading: Lowered to just a commoner
• Historical Precedent: The primary monarch to lose his honorifics in modern times
• Naval Career: Particularly painful given his service in the conflict

He remains a royal advisor, theoretically able to substitute for the monarch, and he is still in the lineage to the throne, but not any of these will actually occur.

Future Prospects

Do individuals he comes across still acknowledge him? Could they still slip up and call him Your Highness? Might they say Andrew,

Of course, he is not withdrawing to a common area, but to the monarchy's extensive grounds at Sandringham.

In that place, he will be provided by the sovereign with one of the royal residences and given some type of financial support.

It is not his previous residence, where he paid a minimal payment for more than 20 years, and the area is a bit far, but even so it may not be far enough.

Pending Matters

The situation continues. There are still documents in the custody of American legislators to be disclosed.

• Political Pressure: Might legislators request additional information
• Fiscal Review: Or examine the improper use of public money
• Legal Possibility: There may even be a law enforcement inquiry into his behavior

Possibly for the time being the harm to the monarchy to the institution is contained. The message from the institution was evidently that the removal of designations was what the king, and notably other senior family members, sought.

Changed Stance

No more deception that Andrew was doing it voluntarily. And, notably, the short communication showed evidently that the monarchy were supporting the accuser's narrative of incidents.

Additionally, for the first time they ultimately showed concern for the affected individuals: "The censures are considered essential, despite the fact that he maintains his innocence of the claims against him."

Finally it is arrogance, self-interest and laziness that will destroy the institution. In his stupidity, personal excess and greed, Andrew seems never to have grasped that reality.